Investigating How Past Environmental Lawsuits Inform the Current AFFF Cases

The AFFF litigation is a major environmental case in the United States. It is based on the claim that AFFF firefighting foam has caused long-term pollution of water sources, soil, and air

In 2016, the EPA issued a lifetime health advisory of 70 ppt for PFOA and PFOS combined. By January 2023, the EU had restricted the use of certain PFAS under REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals). 

To understand the potential implications and outcomes of the AFFF lawsuit, consider similar previous environmental lawsuits. This article compares the AFFF lawsuit with three cases: the Kleenex plant contamination in Connecticut and Camp Lejeune Water Contamination. It also examines Municipal Water Contamination Lawsuits.

Kleenex Plant Contamination Lawsuit in Connecticut

The Kleenex plant contamination lawsuit in Connecticut alleges that a Kleenex plant contaminated nearby drinking water with toxic PFAS chemicals. It endangered residents’ health and lowered property values. The lawsuit claims the plant’s air emissions are to blame for the region’s contaminated wells.

The plaintiffs are seeking $5 million for damages, installation of water filters, and health monitoring expenses. This case shows how a single source can cause widespread contamination, with severe health and financial impacts on communities.

Camp Lejeune Water Contamination Lawsuit

The U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune’s water was allegedly contaminated for decades. It caused major health problems for residents and employees, per the Camp Lejeune water contamination lawsuit.

There is already more than $21 billion set aside for claims related to Camp Lejeune. The case highlights the risks of long-term exposure to toxins and the significant financial cost of remedying widespread contamination.

Municipal Water Contamination Lawsuits

Municipal water suppliers filed lawsuits against manufacturers alleging water contamination. Thousands of individuals are the victims of this contamination. People exposed to toxic chemicals in their drinking water later developed cancers like testicular, kidney, and pancreatic cancer. 

After Judge Gregel’s ruling on February 13, 2024, Chemours, DuPont, and Corteva agreed to pay $1.18 billion, settling these cases.

Important Lessons for the Current AFFF Lawsuit 

Analyzing these earlier cases offers important information about the possible results and ramifications of the firefighter foam lawsuit. Here are some key takeaways:

Possibility of wide-scale contamination: Lawsuits from Camp Lejeune and the Kleenex plant reveal that large-scale contamination can stem from a single source. Such contamination events may impact large populations, negatively affecting health and finances. The AFFF lawsuit suggests extensive contamination from its widespread use in firefighting operations and training. This could affect many communities and individuals.

Major financial repercussions: Litigations like Camp Lejeune and Municipal water contamination show the high costs needed to address pollution and compensate victims. These costs cover the price of cleanup, medical care, and damages awarded. Likewise, given the widespread use of AFFF and its potential health risks, the lawsuit might have a large financial impact.

Health effects: All three lawsuits highlight that exposure to toxins can detrimentally affect health, including various forms of cancer. Thyroid disease, kidney, and testicular cancer, as well as other health concerns, are connected to exposure to PFAS in AFFF.

Legal precedents: These lawsuits provide legal precedents that could potentially influence the outcome of the AFFF lawsuit. They show legal strategies, evidence types, and the potential for settlement or litigation in similar cases. According to TorHoerman Law, these precedents could inform the strategies used in the AFFF lawsuit and potentially influence its outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does AFFF foam have a ban?

Although AFFF is not entirely prohibited, its usage has been limited because of its toxicity. The use of AFFF has been restricted by the EPA, and it is presently prohibited in more than 30 nations.

What signs indicate exposure to AFFF?

AFF foam exposure can cause cancer and other illnesses, among other health problems. New lumps in the breast or underarm, blood in urine, and side or back pain are possible symptoms. Appetite loss, unexplained weight loss, exhaustion, fever, and other symptoms may also occur.

Does AFFF lead to infertility?

Infertility problems have indeed been connected to AFFF exposure. The dangerous chemicals in AFFF may affect a woman’s fertility and may prevent her from becoming pregnant.

Which substances in AFFF foam are carcinogenic?

PFAS (per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances), which are hazardous and carcinogenic, are among the cancer-causing substances found in AFFF foam. These substances may cause different kinds of cancer.

Analyzing prior environmental court cases can offer important insights into the possible results and ramifications of the AFFF lawsuit. They stress the urgency of addressing chemical contamination and the essential need for responsibility and cleanup efforts. It’s crucial to monitor these cases and others as the AFFF lawsuit progresses to gain further knowledge and understanding.

Leave a Comment